A
public bus rolls haltingly through the low-slung hopelessness of West
Sacramento, California. A family of four stands at a bus stop, two
children with fudgesicles, their dark-haired father in a black tank
top and bushy mustache, the lanky, harrowed-looking mother gazing
toward nothing in the distance. Physically, she could be his sister.
He may be out of work, they on the road with him. The summer
afternoon in the wide open valley is hot. Sunlight off the white
sidewalk hurts their eyes. Later, in the evening, the children are
soothed with the noise of American television in motel rooms.
McDonald's dinners. Dad with a six-pack on the little round table by
the window. The blinds are down, the children on the edge of the bed,
the mother lying face down in a stagnant, drying creek two blocks
away, drunkenly taking in bits of what water remains. She is a high
school graduate. He has been trained to drive big trucks. It is
summer and the children have finished school, said goodbye to one or
two other children, to a teacher who thought the boy was a poor
student, who didn't know he'd had a sister in the lower grades. The
father watches the television from the table, wonders where his wife
could be.
Warning
Once a place for articles I wrote that failed to get published,
this blog is becoming something else.
this blog is becoming something else.
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
Seen, circa 1992, West Sacramento
Monday, July 15, 2013
Three Unforeseen Masterpieces
3 unforeseen masterpieces, multiple copies |
A couple of years back, I had two unpublished essays in hand: this one here, about three great works of American nonfiction by three authors famous for things other than writing; and another, more personal one, that I thought was the best thing I'd ever written. The latter one, the personal one, wasn't quite done, but I thought that when it was I might submit it to The Believer. While I was finishing it, I submitted this literary one below. I expected them to reject it; while I had published many articles in GQ and some other local magazines, everything I had ever submitted to a literary publication had been rejected. Still, I figured that by the time they read and rejected this one, I'd have the other one finished, it would be the best thing I ever wrote, I would immediately follow up with it, and they would like it. But before that could happen, to my great surprise and even greater delight, they accepted this one here. There followed a long silence. A couple of times in the following months, I emailed asking for an update, but got little information in return. In the meantime, I finished the personal essay, submitted it, and it got rejected. It took another year and a half for edits on the accepted, literary essay to come, and several months more after my re-write, but eventually The Believer changed their minds about the piece and told me they wouldn't be publishing it after all. Neither would anyone else, I suspect. So, here it is, because I think it is interesting and that it might inspire a few people to read these three books, which will bring them pleasure. The Sarah Palin opening is slightly dated, but the point of it is clear enough, so I won't revise it with a more relevant name. (I'm so glad she's no longer relevant.)
To read the essay, please go here:
Three Unforeseen Masterpieces:
Grant's Personal Memoirs; Thomas Hart Benton's An Artist in America; Whittaker Chambers' Witness.*
* I know there's a typo in the introduction to the full essay, but blogspot won't let me correct it, for now...
From the essay:
There are examples, though admittedly moving ever deeper into America’s past, of great works of literature being produced by public figures whom we might not have thought capable of writing an undeniable literary gem. And in three particularly controversial cases, neither their bitterest enemies nor their harshest critics could naysay the literary force at work in narratives by three men each of whom had found fame without words: one as a zealot and informer, one as an iconoclastic muralist, one as a master of the art of war and a drunk who kept falling off his horse. What Whittaker Chambers, Thomas Hart Benton, and Ulysses S. Grant have in common is this: each at a critical point in his life wrote a brilliant autobiography evocative of his times, his country, and his soul. All three wrote books that betrayed an intimacy and skill with words unforeseen in an otherwise complex life. Each author achieved a singular, unmistakable tone. Each work is an invitation into the distinct and fertile mind of its creator.
Saturday, July 13, 2013
Friday, July 12, 2013
Poem by Desmond O'Grady
This is one of those poems, like R.S. Thomas' "Song at the Year's Turning," that I can't really figure out but love very much anyway. I love "fisted flex of heart." Also how "staring staring silence" is revisited later with the "Unwinking eyes of saints" and "I felt the Churcheyed, fidget fear." I love the structure of the three long sentences that make up the three stanzas, and the tone of frustration, perhaps tinged with surrender. Perhaps not tinged with surrender. I'm not really sure. I like the outraged shock in the question of the title. Is it outraged shock? Is it a sort of mocking of teenage petulance? There's some kind of returning going on, but is it to an emotion? Or a place? And if it's to a place, is it a physical place or a spiritual one? Maybe it's all of these things. Or none of them. I can't really figure it out. But still I love this poem by the Irishman, Desmond O'Grady, which I found in his 1967 collection called The Dark Edge of Europe.
Was
I Supposed to Know?
When,
In a
blue-sharp, fallow sky,
With
wind in hair
And
grey of rock, angled by ages, sharpening the eye,
I
Stamped
down that cut stone stair
Towards
sand and sea
And
clawed, nails scratching, down from the deaf-mute cliffs to where
Were
track and trees below --
Was I
supposed to know?
When,
With
senses quick as compass
And
tightened skin,
In
breaking clearing, fell on Church and Churchyard moss
I,
Helpless,
toeheeled in
To
Christ and Cross
And
staring staring silence, felt small as a pin,
Felt
schoolboy years ago --
Was I
supposed to know?
Was I
supposed to know
That
each fisted flex of heart
And
wide of eye,
Each
pitch of thought in bone-sprung skull; each stutter start
Of
unravelled blood in my
Knit
flesh and bone;
And
every studied part I cast me as a boy;
That
all my rebel scorn
And
mock at prayer,
My
every bedded bitch and spilled out kids unborn,
Were
All
marked mine with care --
By
some high Law
Or
some high guiding Plan -- to lead me back to where,
Again,
With
coffin smell of pew
And
chris of Cross,
Unwinking
eyes of saints and hushed confession queue --
For
one loud nervous boot
Of
frightened heart,
I felt
the Churcheyed, fidget fear of schooltied youth?
Friday, June 28, 2013
Satan's Waiting Room, or Stages of Grief
Wrote
this article about formerly famous rock bands sustaining their
careers at casinos for GQ
in 2006. It got
killed. Spin read
it, and said they might run it, but changed their minds. GQ
kindly paid me my
full fee for the story (or gave me credit for the wordage, as I think
I was on contract at the time). It was a lot of work and travel. It's
not easy to get to Atlantic City from Oakland, for example, and I
wanted to take a bus on the final leg; I thought it might be
interesting to ride a Friday night bus from Philly to Atlantic City,
just to see who my fellow passengers might be. I was wrong. I recall
being more disappointed by the Spin
rejection, I guess because it would have been so nice for a killed
thing to find a life after death. I did a bunch of editing at Spin's
request, but in the end, they lost interest. I had originally pitched
it to GQ as a story about once-famous rock acts playing at state and
county fairs. But GQ thought it would be more interesting at casinos.
They were probably right, but somehow I just couldn't pull it off.
The original version included an REO Speedwagon show and backstage
interview. I don't remember why or when that section got dropped.
Might have to do with how nice the REO guys were, and that I just
couldn't find much funny to say about them. I never liked their
music. Or Eddie Money or Rick Springfield, for that matter. I admit
to liking Styx briefly when very young. Doobie Brothers I have liked
on and off, and they are very much the sound of my childhood summers.
It was humiliating for the story never to see the light of day. It
involved so much travel and work that just about everyone I knew was
aware that I was working on it and was excited about it and often
asked me how it was going and when it would appear. On my last trip
to Vegas, outside the Eddie Money show, some dude sneezed all over me
and I ended up being sick for weeks. The husband of a co-worker of my
wife was a huge, life-long REO fan, and so I took him with me to the
show and then backstage afterwards. It was very exciting for him,
which was nice, but just added to my embarrassment when the story
died. Of course, magazine stories get killed for all kinds of
reasons, not always to do with the quality of the writer's work. But
this one was probably my fault. My original, working title was
"Satan's Waiting Room." It was some kind of joke about how,
if Florida is God's waiting room, and if Rock & Roll is
Satanic, and if casinos are where old bands go to die, then casinos
would be Satan's waiting...well, you get it.
Stages of Grief
At first, to catch
their names on a state fair schedule -- Journey, Styx, Blue Oyster
Cult -- seemed a kind of cosmic rock comeuppance. Finally, these
bands who had blasted music back into a dark, bullshit age of
meaningless rock opera pomp, who had never deserved their former
fortune or fame, were getting theirs in the hellish heat of the fair.
But in my more reflective moments, a certain nagging sadness would taint my schadenfreude. Did any formerly-famous musical act really deserve this fate: forced to trudge onstage and fain the triumphant rock and roll body language of their glory years while banging out their hit songs for the millionth time before another sweaty, heat-dazed, corn-on-the-cob sucking American crowd staggering about the fairgrounds.
Well, now these former idols and two-hit wonder mainstays of the fair have come in from the heat: fairgrounds rock has taken over the glam stages of Vegas and Atlantic City and the glamour-free nightclubs of the far-flung Indian reservations. Frampton is here. Juice Newton is here. REO Speedwagon is here. Even some remnant of Queen is here.
Sooner or later they’ll all be here in rock and roll’s Indian burial ground.
But in my more reflective moments, a certain nagging sadness would taint my schadenfreude. Did any formerly-famous musical act really deserve this fate: forced to trudge onstage and fain the triumphant rock and roll body language of their glory years while banging out their hit songs for the millionth time before another sweaty, heat-dazed, corn-on-the-cob sucking American crowd staggering about the fairgrounds.
Well, now these former idols and two-hit wonder mainstays of the fair have come in from the heat: fairgrounds rock has taken over the glam stages of Vegas and Atlantic City and the glamour-free nightclubs of the far-flung Indian reservations. Frampton is here. Juice Newton is here. REO Speedwagon is here. Even some remnant of Queen is here.
Sooner or later they’ll all be here in rock and roll’s Indian burial ground.
To read the whole thing, go here: Satan's Waiting Room
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
More Chekhov, more on books
This paragraph from a Chekhov short story describes something of how I read. The first and last sentences sound particularly familiar. Are these the last years of my confinement? What am I confined in? Life and consciousness and failure. Could books save me? (With the passage's final image, I was reminded of Ishmael clinging to Queequeg's coffin.) Ultimately, they destroy the prisoner in the story. Books, and his years of solitude, turn him into a cynic, a misanthrope, a Timon. Is Chekhov saying that if you knew humanity only through its books, you would want to avoid it in real life? Is he saying that that conclusion would be accurate? And if so, is he blaming humanity for this outcome, or just writers of books, like himself?
During the last years of his confinement the prisoner read an extraordinary amount, quite haphazard. Now he would apply himself to the natural sciences, then he would read Byron or Shakespeare. Notes used to come from him in which he asked to be sent at the same time a book on chemistry, a textbook of medicine, a novel, and some treatise on philosophy or theology. He read as though he were swimming in the sea among broken pieces of wreckage, and in his desire to save his life was eagerly grasping one piece after another.
-Anton Chekhov
"The Bet"
During the last years of his confinement the prisoner read an extraordinary amount, quite haphazard. Now he would apply himself to the natural sciences, then he would read Byron or Shakespeare. Notes used to come from him in which he asked to be sent at the same time a book on chemistry, a textbook of medicine, a novel, and some treatise on philosophy or theology. He read as though he were swimming in the sea among broken pieces of wreckage, and in his desire to save his life was eagerly grasping one piece after another.
-Anton Chekhov
"The Bet"
Monday, June 17, 2013
The part you can skip: WHF
I think it is much better for a book to have some parts that can be skipped just as well as not, you get through it so much faster. I have often thought what a good thing it would be if somebody would write a book that we could skip the whole of. I think a good many people would like to have such a book as that. I know I should.
-William Henry Frost
Fairies and Folk of Ireland (1901)
-William Henry Frost
Fairies and Folk of Ireland (1901)
Line from the poet Desmond O'Grady
There's a time in the wound of childhood when something clots.
-Desmond O'Grady
from the poem "The Nail"
Also see: Poem by Desmond O'Grady - Was I Supposed to Know?
-Desmond O'Grady
from the poem "The Nail"
Also see: Poem by Desmond O'Grady - Was I Supposed to Know?
Monday, May 13, 2013
Books: the way of the horse
It wouldn't be a terrible fate; everybody loves horses. But I think someday print books will have gone the
way of horses, once not too too long ago so essential in so many ways, now a curiosity, a
luxury, a pleasure to see but few of us ever really get near them or
need them. Someday there will be people among us who own books
(horses), who read books (ride horses) regularly. And, like horse people today, book people will be seen as sort of interesting for that
slightly exotic bit of culture they experience with their books
(horses) and all their book-(horse)-friends. Some of us will envy them
their special interest and the activity of reading (riding) and caring for their
books (horses) and that extra bit of knowledge they have about types
(breeds) of books (horses) and how to handle a book (horse). Having grown up
around books (horses), many of their children will have learned to
love books (horses) and will come to have their own. Nearly everyone
will at some time in his or her life have read a book (ridden a
horse), on vacation at a fancy resort or while visiting a family friend who keeps a
few. Some will find they enjoy being around books (horses) and
reading books (riding horses) but will never come to own one. Perhaps they will be prohibitively expensive to own. Perhaps some will find they are allergic to books (horses), or
frightened of them. I think I will be dead by the time this happens,
but perhaps not for long.
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
From Kickham's Knocknagow
Irishman C.J. Kickham's 19th Century novel Knocknagow is exceedingly charming and often very funny. That's why this dead-serious, grisly passage, which I read last night, came as a shock. I happen pretty much by accident to be reading Knocknagow immediately after finishing Thomas Flanagan's great historical novel, The Year of the French, about the bleak and bloody 1798 uprising of the Irish, with some aid from the French, against their English overlords. Knocknagow is set some decades later, but a couple of veterans of '98 populate the book, and the '98 Uprising has become part of the consciousness of many of the younger characters as well. Here we learn the reason that Mrs. Donovan (mother to Mat the Thrasher, local hero for his good looks, good nature, and hurling prowess) tends to have a sad face, which the narrator calls "the shadow of a curse." The soldiers referred to are English Red Coats, although some of them may well have been native Irish. The yoeman are local troops loyal to the crown.
Poor Mrs. Donovan
got that sad face of hers one bright summer day in the year '98 when
her father's house was surrounded by soldiers and yeomen, and her
only brother, a bright-eyed boy of seventeen, was torn from the arms
of his mother, and shot dead outside the door. And then a gallant
officer twisted his hand in the boy's golden hair, and invited them
all to observe how, with one blow of his trusty sword, he would sever
the rebel head from the rebel carcase. But one blow, nor two, nor
three, nor ten, did not do; and the gallant officer hacked away at
the poor boy's neck in a fury, and was in so great a passion that
when the trunk fell down at last, leaving the head in his hand, he
flung it on the ground, and kicked it like a football; and when it
rolled against the feet of the horrified young girl, who stood as if
she were turned to stone near the door, she fell down senseless
without cry or moan, and they all thought she too was dead. She
awoke, however, the second next day following, just in time to kiss
the poor bruised and disfigured lips before the coffin-lid was nailed
down upon them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)